O'Bannon and his attorneys filed the suit last July, claiming that the images of former athletes should not be used by the NCAA in television ads, video games, etc without the consent and compensation of the athlete.
"This is a truly historic day - to our knowledge, no one has ever gotten behind the scenes to examine how student-athletes' current and future rights in their images are divided up and sold," said Jon T. King of Hausfeld LLP, one of the lead lawyers representing O'Bannon.
The NCAA has licensing deals worth an estimated $4 billion dollars. Much of that money is earned on the backs of African American families, many of whom remain in poverty while coaches sign contracts worth as much as $5 million dollars per year. The case is important, because it finally allows the courts to determine whether or not the NCAA is truly an amateur organization, or if it is something more.
"We think the N.C.A.A. will defend this case saying they are protecting amateurism and trying to prevent excess commercialization," King said. "That's their mantra in regard to the big-business aspect. We think their hypocrisy will be fully exposed once their numbers are put in the public eye."
I've spoken in many cases about the NCAA and the fact that this organization has been given a license by Congress to exploit young athletes and their families. Many universities earn millions of dollars from athlete labor, but they've been allowed to engage in unconstitutional restrictions on the labor rights of athletes. In no other avenue of American life has compensation become criminalized as it has been with the NCAA. What's even more interesting is that rules designed to control the revenue stream, such as NBA and NFL age limits (to keep athletes from going professional) don't exist in sports dominated by white athletes, like tennis and baseball. If any other industry were to operate in the same manner as the NCAA, the Justice Department would tear them down immediately. It's time for a new paradigm.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and the Athlete Liberation and Academic Reform Movement (ALARM). To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 

Comments: (2)
Add a comment
By: hwill2000 on 2/10/2010 12:35AM
as much as i would like to side with the athletes, a free education, at today's cost, is a substantial compensation package. however,henceforth, let them play professional at any age as in hockey,tennis,golf and baseball.
the compensation for former athletes that have left school will be complicated to evaluate. this will be interesting.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ThePlayer on 2/10/2010 8:51AM
It'll be interesting. The essence of the current lawsuit is that the individual suing is a "former" member of the NCAA, and as such is suing for the right to be compensated for use of his image currently, as communicated by the article.
How far reaching the lawsuit is will be interesting to see; whether it will include active or current NCAA players.
Report This