Neutral

@tanzyp, really now, are you serious? Both you and Dr. Watkins are really reaching to have the words of this dishonorable prostitute have anything to do with the issue of STD's. First to you tanzyp, it is doubtable that you nor the good PhD run in the circles of Tiger and the women he bedded. The reason that is significant is the mentality that is common place in those lifestyles. You have people that awaken in a different city most mornings to find people (both male and female) doting on their every word and waiting to carryout their every request. I might add, without questioning any part of the request. This builds a skewed view of society and causes a distortion of what most of the rest of the world experiences as the thing we call "life". A prostitute/sex worker that is as high priced as those mentioned in the scandal have accepted a truth about their profession, I rent myself to make money. The level of service I provide is based on my(her)valuation of the level of health risk, pain and possibility of legal repercussion. If all three are met, the deed is done. This is different than a sexual groupie which clearly several of the women that Tiger reportedly sleep with are. Ms. Jolie is one of the latter as her intention was to sleep with the famous in order to have later blackmail ammunition or to place it in an embarrasing tell-all book. Her message is to supposedly offer guidance to women on how to keep their men from straying when tempted. She, as seen through Dr. Watkins printed quotes, suggest that her "help" is that she and women like her offer something that is missing at home or a possible unspoken or taboo need that the wives fail to recognize. She doesn't give 2 shakes about the risks that may result from her chosen lifestyle to the disconnected wives. Her outlook doesn't understand the concept of altruism. And tanzyp, with regard to the settlement amount, nothing about the decision concerned itself with the potential of long term health consequences to Elin. It is the purest form of outdated protectionism as applied to the female gender for a principle that is no longer valid. This type of transferral of wealth was intended to allow a "stay-at-home" wife that dutifully cleaned house, cooked meals, washed clothes, provided sex on demand and was dependent on her husband for current and future financial support based on her perceived lack of education, employability and fulfillment of all wifely duties over a sizeable period of years. The thought of her being afflected with a STD was nowhere in the equation. The mere hint that this was applicable is out-right laughable. What is obscene is the fact that so many high-priced divorces do involve such transferral of wealth based on out-of-touch legal precidents. And for you Dr. Watkins, respectfully, I was doing my internship with the physician that treated Eazy during the time of his demise. You have no clue on the method of innoculation of his infection, so don't arrogantly sit and postulate on such things. Then you go and suggest that there was a string of subsequent infections based on his "many women". Do you have any information that supports your assertion as evidenced through claims on his estate? No, you do not have this because the claims were made based on the fathering of children or contracts of failed access to the recording industry. Many of the elders in our community have said it best and I will paraphrase it. If you don't know what you say to be a fact, say nothing at all. Peace

 Report This