
The most intriguing aspect of the Fab Five special on ESPN was not their exploits on the basketball court (which were amazing), it was the conversation about money. When these five young men stepped onto the court for the University of Michigan, they instantly became cash cows for their universities. Sales of University of Michigan merchandise went from $1.5 million per year to over $10 million per year shortly after their first season. Jalen Rose, one of the members of the Fab Five, mentioned seeing that Nike had released a sneaker named after the group, and they regularly found their academic schedules being interrupted with trips around the world to promote a brand that was making everyone rich except for their own families.
There was also talk of a "scandalous" and "unethical" relationship that the players had with Ed Martin, a Detroit man who gave financial support to the players both before and during their time at The University of Michigan. The relationship was deemed illicit, as is any relationship that gives players access to money, even if they were the ones who earned it. The NCAA works very hard to ensure that athletes and their families are kept out of the revenue stream, so they can personally maximize their own individual bank accounts. As a result of the Fab Five affiliation with Martin, the university forfeited its entire '92-'93 season and agreed to completely disassociate itself with Chris Weber until 2013. Weber's records are also wiped out of the books completely, among other things. In other words, the Fab Five officially doesn't exist at the University of Michigan.
While Martin's ties to illegal gambling are problematic, what is even more disconcerting is the NCAA's conclusion that these young men and their families were somehow less worthy than coaches, administrators and commentators of earning income from their labor. The presence of the Fab Five at the University of Michigan was a cash cow for university administrators, to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. The fact that we live in a country that advocates for the second-class citizenship and the stripping of labor rights of revenue-generating athletes and their hard-working mothers is highly un-American. Making matters worse is the reality that many of these athletes are black and brown kids who come from poor inner-city families who face debilitating economic problems on a daily basis. This will probably be the last chance many of these men have to earn this kind of money ever again, even if they do finish that degree in recreational studies that everyone seems so enthusiastic about. (I love education, but I'd be more than happy to trade a college diploma for $10 million dollars. I can always go back to school later.)
Perhaps if the NCAA were to allow college athletes access to the same labor rights that they fully expect for themselves, athletes would not be forced to violate a long list of rules in order to get a bag of groceries or dinner at a fast food restaurant (since when did groceries become reason for prosecution?). The NCAA is set to earn close to a billion dollars during March Madness this year, putting them on par with every professional sports league in the world. This money is going to go into the hands of coaches, commentators and mostly white families, all on the backs of a group of predominantly African-American athletes. The athletes are forced to endure the schedules of professional athletes, as well as tremendous pressure from the media and other financial stakeholders, which inhibits their ability to get educated.
As a college professor at universities with major athletics programs (U. Kentucky, Indiana University, The Ohio State University and Syracuse), I can assure you that the player's ability to get an education is significantly affected by their athletics schedules. I've even seen players told to change their major so their academic calender can fit with their practice schedule. But even if they do graduate, this does not replace the millions that are stolen from the athlete and his family during his years on the court or field. In fact, if every player in the NCAA tournament were to receive even a fraction of the money he generates for the NCAA, the average player in the tournament would receive a check for at least three-quarters of a million dollars, with the highest-earning athletes bringing home as much $5 to $10 million for just this tournament alone (this doesn't include fees from merchandising, concessions, ticket sales and even video games).
It's nice to see that men like Jalen Rose (formerly of the Fab Five, who is now a commentator for ESPN) have the courage to speak out on this issue, so that young athletes from their own communities don't have to struggle in poverty while others around them bring home wealth to their families. Black and poor people also deserve a piece of the economic pie, and it's time that the NCAA let go of its segregationist policies. In fact, the Congressional Black Caucus should speak up on the matter at some point and question the tax exempt, nonprofit status of the professional sports league that keeps telling everyone that they are just a group of naive amateurs engaged in a recreational activity. College sports is no longer child's play, and the billions of dollars being earned by the league needs to be re-analyzed with an eye toward equity.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here. To follow Dr. Boyce on Facebook, please click here.
Comments: (29)
Add a comment
By: souljamz on 3/14/2011 9:22AM
its a shame that the coaches and schools play god when they live and get paid high salaries for the hard work of these young men and women, it points to the greed we see in college sports the schools can make a fortune but the kids better not take a dollar from there older brother or sister or a plane ticket to go see family. Its ashame.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Steve Colter on 3/14/2011 1:34PM
Great story overall but there are also plenty of minority athletes that have hard-working fathers too. I'm one of them! Let's not exacerbate the fatherless stereotype. There is a great deal of hard-working fathers who don't make a ton of money but take care of their families.My father worked his butt off and I reward him for it every chance I get!!!!!
God bless you sir....
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Veronica on 3/22/2011 7:53AM
Your article is on point.I am happy that the documentary will help to bring light to this so long accepted form of "pimping" of young black athletes.Why should these white collar criminals continue to benefit from the sweat of these young men.It is wrong and needs to stop.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Charles on 3/14/2011 10:56AM
If I didn't know better I'd think DR. Boyce is promoting his own agenda i.e. ALAARM. No I'm wrong. He just cares about Black athletes slaving in the fields for the white man because if you paid athletes a salary they wouldn't cheat with boosters. Yea right!
Poor exploited Black athlete. I guess a full ride just isn't enough. Dr Boyce wants to make sure your parents get a ride too.
So as an athlete I should be able to choose the college I attend by determining who will pay me the most. Which colleges should pay their athletes? Does that include small colleges and HBCUs? Will female athletes make as much as their male counterparts? Should I an athlete get worker's comp and 401k(s)?
The $10 million dollars that you state UM made during the Fab Five era. Didn't that go into the coffers of the University to help their bottom line. Isn't that a good thing.
I do have an issue with the use of a player's image after they leave the university. There needs to be some compensation if a school licenses their image but paying athletes directly will ruin college sports.
Stop using all that inflammatory speech when you talk about Black athletes. It's insulting to OUR elders who really had to struggle with segregation.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Art on 3/15/2011 7:20AM
The athlete doesn't get a full ride. They get a 1 year scholarship, if they produce, they get the next year. Doesn't sound like a full ride or a student athlete. This sounds like a contract worker who should be paid. The NBA and the colleges work together to keep the top athletes in school unpaid. I hope these exploited kids get smart and go overseas and make their money, come back and pay for their own ride at college.
Report This
By: Kenneth on 3/15/2011 9:05AM
I think you missed the whole point. Its not just about Black Athletes, its about athletes in general. I played college basketball and literally was poor during my whole college career. And no, I didn't have a full ride the whole time I was playing. It does make since that if the sport is bringing money to the school, then the student/athlete should be compensated.
What you are saying is that, at your job, as long as they are paying for your parking pass, it would be ok for you to work for free? Especially if you are the one making all of the money. What is going on in these schools is the money makers are being asked to work for free, while the colleges and universities get all the compensation for it.
Referring to the 10 million that Michigan got with the Fab 5, how much do you thing the scholarship was for the players? Maybe 10,000 a year? So if there are 15 athletes, and say they are all full ride athletes, then that means the school is spending 150,000 a year on the students, and keeping $9,850,000 of it for the school. I know travel isnt that much.
All in all, being an ex student athlete that was FULLY dependant on the school for food/room/board, because you were not allowed jobs, per NCAA, and family didn't have the money to send. Having most of my tuition being paid by pell grants and student loans. People are not understanding that college athletes, although they may be treated like royalty by the fans, and loved by the schools by their abilities, still have to suffer through being a kid in college. And unless their family has money to send, its being a poor kid in college. So I agree when they say if the sports program makes money off the athletes, then why shouldn't the athlete get some of the money. You would never let anyone make money off of you without compensating you for it.
Report This
By: John Lindsay on 3/14/2011 11:57AM
Charles: because if you paid athletes a salary they wouldn't cheat with boosters. Yea right!
JohnL: No, WRONG.
Again, why should these athletes earn NOTHING while coaches, the schools, the NCAA, businesses using the schools' logos, etc. make millions of dollars?!
Charles: I guess a full ride just isn't enough.
JohnL: The cost of a college education...is PEANUTS...PEANUTS...COMPARED to the revenue generated by these athletes.
Charles: Dr Boyce wants to make sure your parents get a ride too.
JohnL: The schools, coaches, NCAA, businesses benefit....so why not the parents, too?!
Charles: So as an athlete I should be able to choose the college I attend by determining who will pay me the most.
JohnL: Just like the rest of us.
Charles: Which colleges should pay their athletes? Does that include small colleges and HBCUs? Will female athletes make as much as their male counterparts? Should I an athlete get worker's comp and 401k(s)?
JohnL: All things that would be worked out somehow.
And by the way, in the private sector, why do women ONLY earn 70 cents for every dollar earned by a man?! Are you asking that question, too?!
Charles: The $10 million dollars that you state UM made during the Fab Five era. Didn't that go into the coffers of the University to help their bottom line. Isn't that a good thing.
JohnL: Totally irrelevant...since ALL schools benefit from their teams going to the NCAA tournament.
Charles: There needs to be some compensation if a school licenses their image but paying athletes directly will ruin college sports.
JohnL: It's just NOT fair that these athletes' families are living in poverty...while the schools, coaches, NCAA, businesses...make hundreds of millions of dollars from the athletes' labor. This is indeed slavery.
If you were an engineering student and developed a product while in school, you could patent it and sell it.
Charles: Stop using all that inflammatory speech when you talk about Black athletes. It's insulting to OUR elders who really had to struggle with segregation.
JohnL: "Keeping one from the benefits of her/his labor"...is indeed reflective of segregation: much less than 1st class citizenship.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: bob on 3/14/2011 1:04PM
@john Lindsay these athletes don't generate squat! It is the schools directors and coaches that do all the work. The players are just what they are players. If they want to be coaches than let them try out for the job. I know that it is too much for you racist mind to understand but if the players don't like it they should quit.. there will be a replacement one second later. Just because you and Boyce want college players to get paid is moot because your retoric is just nonsense and college player will never get paid period! So why don't you and thye fake Dr just drop it, it is really getting old.
Report This
By: Leonardo on 3/14/2011 12:11PM
ESPN's The Fab Five: Just reinforced/reaffirmed the hypocrisy that goes on @ these Institutions of Higher learning when it comes 2 the college athelete. This will continue to b a thorn in there sides until they find away to compensate these atheletes with whom the schools make millions n millions of dollars off!!!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ronald Slater on 3/14/2011 6:10PM
COLORED ATHLETE??? Just what's in those teabags you & your teabag brethen are using? Common sense & spelling obviously are not! Spare us using the education card until you can pull it from the deck and use it yourself.
Reply to this Comment | Report This